Skip to main content
HomeBlogRoute Optimization: How to Save 2+ Hours Per Technician Per Day
Operations

December 8, 2025

11 min read

Route Optimization: How to Save 2+ Hours Per Technician Per Day

Poor routing wastes fuel, time, and money. Learn proven strategies to optimize technician routes and boost daily job capacity by 15-25%.

M

Marcus Thompson

Field Service Expert

Share:

[Featured Image Placeholder]

Route Optimization: How to Save 2+ Hours Per Technician Per Day

Your dispatcher looks at tomorrow's schedule:

  • Tech #1: 6 jobs across town
  • Tech #2: 5 jobs scattered randomly
  • Tech #3: 7 jobs with no clear route

They do their best to create a logical sequence. But:

  • Tech #1 drives 85 miles, zigzagging across service area
  • Tech #2 spends 3.5 hours driving (only 4.5 hours working)
  • Tech #3 arrives late to 3 appointments

Better route optimization could have:

  • Reduced driving by 35% (55 miles instead of 85)
  • Added 1-2 more jobs per tech per day
  • Saved $45 in fuel per tech
  • Improved on-time arrival rate to 95%+

Annual impact: $67,500 in wasted fuel + $450,000 in lost productivity

The Cost of Poor Routing

Time Waste

Average field service technician:

  • 8-hour workday
  • 2.5-3.5 hours driving (30-45% of day)
  • 4.5-5.5 hours working
  • 5-6 jobs per day

With optimized routing:

  • 1.5-2 hours driving (20-25% of day)
  • 6-6.5 hours working
  • 6-8 jobs per day

Productivity gain: 15-30% more revenue-generating time

Fuel Cost

Poor routing example (10 technicians):

  • 80 miles per tech per day
  • 15 MPG average
  • $3.50 per gallon
  • Cost: $18.67 per tech per day
  • Annual: $46,675 (250 work days)

Optimized routing:

  • 55 miles per tech per day
  • Same vehicle efficiency
  • Cost: $12.83 per tech per day
  • Annual: $32,075

Fuel savings: $14,600 per year

Maintenance and Wear

Reduced mileage = Less frequent:

  • Oil changes
  • Tire replacements
  • Brake service
  • Major repairs

Savings: $2,000-4,000 per vehicle per year

Opportunity Cost

Most expensive waste: Jobs not completed

Math:

  • Each tech wastes 1 hour/day on poor routing
  • Could complete 1 additional job
  • 10 techs × 1 job × 250 days = 2,500 jobs/year
  • $250 average ticket
  • Lost revenue: $625,000 per year

This is the real cost of poor routing.

Route Optimization Fundamentals

Key Principles

1. Minimize total distance

  • Shortest path between all stops
  • Avoid backtracking
  • Group nearby jobs

2. Respect time windows

  • Customer availability
  • Promised arrival times
  • Traffic patterns

3. Balance workload

  • Distribute jobs evenly
  • Consider job complexity and duration
  • Prevent tech burnout

4. Account for real-world factors

  • Traffic congestion
  • Road construction
  • Weather conditions
  • Technician skills and equipment

The Traveling Salesman Problem

Route optimization is mathematically complex:

  • 5 stops = 120 possible routes
  • 10 stops = 3.6 million possible routes
  • 15 stops = 1.3 trillion possible routes

Solution: Algorithms that find near-optimal routes in seconds

Manual Route Optimization (Small Teams)

For 1-3 Technicians

Visual mapping approach:

Step 1: Print map of service area Step 2: Mark all job locations with pins Step 3: Identify clusters Step 4: Assign clusters to technicians Step 5: Sequence jobs within each cluster

Tools:

  • Google Maps (free)
  • Physical map with pins
  • Spreadsheet with addresses

Time required: 20-30 minutes per day

Example routing logic:

Morning (8 AM - 12 PM):
- Start: Tech's home or office
- Job 1: Closest to start (8:00-9:00)
- Job 2: Nearest to Job 1 (9:15-10:15)
- Job 3: Nearest to Job 2 (10:30-11:30)
- Lunch: Near Job 3 location (11:45-12:30)

Afternoon (12:30 PM - 5 PM):
- Job 4: Near lunch location (12:45-1:45)
- Job 5: Nearest to Job 4 (2:00-3:00)
- Job 6: Nearest to Job 5 (3:15-4:15)
- Return: Shortest path home (4:30-5:00)

Geographic Clustering

Divide service area into zones:

Example (HVAC company):

Zone A: Northwest (Neighborhoods 1-5)
Zone B: Northeast (Neighborhoods 6-10)
Zone C: Central (Downtown + surrounding)
Zone D: Southwest (Neighborhoods 11-15)
Zone E: Southeast (Neighborhoods 16-20)

Assign technicians by zone:

  • Reduces cross-town driving
  • Technicians become familiar with area
  • Shorter response times
  • Better local reputation

Flexibility: Techs can cross zones if needed, but prefer zone assignments

The Nearest Neighbor Method

Simple algorithm:

  1. Start at first location
  2. Go to nearest unvisited location
  3. Repeat until all locations visited
  4. Return to start

Pros: Simple, fast, 80-90% as good as optimal Cons: Not always the absolute best route

Good enough for: Small teams, simple schedules

Software-Based Route Optimization

For 4+ Technicians

Manual optimization doesn't scale beyond 3-4 technicians.

When you need software:

  • 4+ technicians
  • 30+ jobs per day
  • Complex time windows
  • Multiple service types
  • Dynamic scheduling (jobs added throughout day)

Route Optimization Software

Standalone options:

Route4Me ($199-999/month):

  • Advanced route optimization
  • Mobile app for drivers
  • Real-time tracking
  • Proof of delivery

OptimoRoute ($35-199/month):

  • AI-powered optimization
  • Real-time adjustments
  • Customer notifications
  • Reporting

WorkWave Route Manager ($49-199/month):

  • Territory management
  • Time window constraints
  • Driver scorecards
  • GPS tracking

Integrated (with field service software):

  • ServiceSync, Housecall Pro, Jobber, ServiceTitan
  • Route optimization + full job management
  • No separate system needed
  • Better data integration

How AI Route Optimization Works

Inputs considered:

  • Job locations (addresses)
  • Time windows (customer availability)
  • Job duration estimates
  • Traffic patterns (real-time and historical)
  • Technician locations (GPS)
  • Technician skills and certifications
  • Vehicle capacity and equipment
  • Priority levels (emergency vs. routine)
  • Customer preferences

Algorithm process:

  1. Calculates all possible routes (millions)
  2. Evaluates each route (distance, time, constraints)
  3. Identifies optimal or near-optimal solution
  4. Presents best routes for each technician
  5. Allows manual adjustments
  6. Re-optimizes if jobs added/changed

Time to optimize: 5-30 seconds (depending on complexity)

Advanced Route Optimization Strategies

Dynamic Re-Routing

Real-time adjustments throughout the day:

Triggers for re-routing:

  • Emergency job added
  • Job cancelled
  • Job takes longer than expected
  • Technician calls in sick
  • Traffic accident/road closure
  • Weather changes

Example scenario:

10:30 AM: Tech #2's second job cancelled
System re-optimizes: Assigns urgent job from overflow list
New route saves 40 minutes, adds $300 job

Benefits:

  • Maximize productivity
  • Fill unexpected gaps
  • Respond to emergencies faster
  • Reduce downtime

Predictive Routing

Use historical data to improve routes:

Data analyzed:

  • Job duration by type, technician, customer
  • Traffic patterns by time of day, day of week
  • Common job clusters
  • Seasonal variations

Improvements:

  • More accurate time estimates (±5 minutes vs. ±20 minutes)
  • Better job sequencing
  • Proactive scheduling
  • Reduced missed time windows

Example:

Historical data shows:
- Job type: AC repair
- Location: Residential neighborhood
- Typical duration: 65 minutes (not 45 minutes estimate)

System automatically adjusts:
- Schedules fewer jobs per tech
- Adds buffer time
- Reduces "running behind" incidents

Multi-Day Route Optimization

Optimize across multiple days:

Use cases:

  • Maintenance agreements (schedule anytime this month)
  • Non-urgent repairs
  • Installation projects
  • Seasonal tune-ups

Benefits:

  • Better geographic clustering
  • Fill slow days
  • Reduce driving even more
  • Smooth workload across week/month

Example:

Customer needs annual AC tune-up (anytime in May)

System finds best slot:
- Tuesday, May 14, 2:00 PM
- Between two other jobs in same neighborhood
- Minimizes drive time
- Fills gap in schedule

Load Balancing

Distribute work evenly across technicians:

Factors balanced:

  • Number of jobs
  • Total drive time
  • Total work time
  • Complexity/difficulty
  • Revenue per tech

Why it matters:

  • Prevents burnout
  • Fair compensation (if commission-based)
  • Better team morale
  • Consistent service quality

Example:

Initial assignment:
- Tech A: 8 jobs, $1,600 revenue, easy jobs
- Tech B: 4 jobs, $2,100 revenue, complex jobs

After balancing:
- Tech A: 6 jobs, $1,800 revenue, mix of complexity
- Tech B: 6 jobs, $1,900 revenue, mix of complexity

Integration with Real-Time Traffic

Why Traffic Matters

Drive time variance:

  • Morning rush (7-9 AM): +30-50% longer
  • Midday (10 AM-3 PM): Normal
  • Evening rush (4-6 PM): +30-50% longer
  • Weekends: -10-20% shorter

Route optimization without traffic: Inaccurate by 30-60 minutes

Route optimization with traffic: Accurate within ±5-10 minutes

Traffic Data Sources

Google Maps API:

  • Real-time traffic conditions
  • Historical traffic patterns
  • Predicted future traffic
  • Turn-by-turn directions

Waze API:

  • Crowdsourced real-time data
  • Accident and hazard alerts
  • Alternative route suggestions

Integration benefits:

  • Avoid congestion automatically
  • Update arrival times dynamically
  • Notify customers of delays
  • Re-route around incidents

Measuring Route Optimization Success

Key Performance Indicators

1. Miles per technician per day

  • Baseline: 70-90 miles
  • Target: 50-65 miles
  • Excellent: <50 miles

2. Drive time percentage

  • Baseline: 35-45% of day
  • Target: 20-30% of day
  • Excellent: <20% of day

3. Jobs per technician per day

  • Baseline: 4-6 jobs
  • Target: 6-8 jobs
  • Excellent: 8+ jobs

4. On-time arrival rate

  • Baseline: 60-75%
  • Target: 85-90%
  • Excellent: >90%

5. Fuel cost per job

  • Baseline: $8-12
  • Target: $5-8
  • Excellent: <$5

Before and After Comparison

Measure for 2 weeks before optimization:

  • Total miles driven
  • Total jobs completed
  • Fuel costs
  • On-time arrivals
  • Overtime hours

Implement optimization

Measure for 2 weeks after:

  • Compare metrics
  • Calculate savings
  • Identify remaining issues

Example results:

Company: ABC Plumbing (8 technicians)

Before:
- 640 miles/day (80 per tech)
- 40 jobs/day (5 per tech)
- $304/day fuel cost
- 68% on-time arrival

After:
- 440 miles/day (55 per tech)
- 52 jobs/day (6.5 per tech)
- $209/day fuel cost
- 91% on-time arrival

Improvements:
- 31% less driving
- 30% more jobs
- 31% fuel savings ($23,750/year)
- 34% better on-time rate
- 30% more revenue ($390,000/year)

Route Optimization Best Practices

1. Build Time Windows

Allow flexibility for better optimization:

Tight windows (less optimization):

  • Customer available: 2:00-2:30 PM only
  • Limits route options
  • May require inefficient routing

Flexible windows (better optimization):

  • Customer available: 1:00-4:00 PM
  • Many route options
  • Can optimize for efficiency

Balance: Customer convenience vs. operational efficiency

2. Buffer Time

Add buffers for unexpected delays:

Types of buffers:

  • Drive time buffer: +15% (accounts for traffic, construction)
  • Job duration buffer: +10-20% (accounts for complexity variation)
  • Daily buffer: 30-60 min unscheduled time (for emergencies, overruns)

Without buffers: Schedule falls apart by 10 AM

With buffers: Can absorb delays, maintain schedule

3. Start and End Points

Consider where techs start and end day:

Home-based technicians:

  • First job near home (reduce commute)
  • Last job near home (reduce commute)
  • Savings: 30-60 min per tech per day

Office-based technicians:

  • First job near office
  • Can return for parts/paperwork at lunch
  • Last job allows office return if needed

4. Job Clustering

Group similar jobs together:

Same-day efficiency:

  • Multiple AC tune-ups in same neighborhood
  • All annual inspections on Tuesdays
  • New installations scheduled together (requires same equipment)

Benefits:

  • Reduced setup/teardown time
  • Efficient parts loading
  • Predictable workflows

5. Continuous Optimization

Route optimization isn't one-and-done:

Weekly reviews:

  • Which routes worked well?
  • Where did delays occur?
  • What can be improved?

Monthly adjustments:

  • Update job duration estimates
  • Revise service area zones
  • Adjust scheduling templates

Quarterly analysis:

  • Comprehensive performance review
  • Benchmark against industry standards
  • Strategic improvements

The Bottom Line

Route optimization is one of the highest-ROI improvements for field service businesses.

Expected results:

  • 15-30% reduction in drive time
  • 15-25% increase in jobs per day
  • 20-30% fuel savings
  • 20-30% improvement in on-time arrivals
  • Better technician work-life balance

Investment required:

  • Small team (1-3 techs): $0 (manual, Google Maps)
  • Medium team (4-10 techs): $50-200/month (route software)
  • Large team (10+ techs): $200-500/month (integrated FSM software)

ROI: 300-1,000%+ in first year

Start today:

  1. Track baseline metrics (1 week)
  2. Implement basic route optimization
  3. Measure results (1 week)
  4. Calculate savings
  5. Invest in software if justified

Every minute saved driving is a minute you can spend serving customers and generating revenue.


ServiceSync includes AI-powered route optimization that considers traffic, time windows, and technician skills to maximize productivity. Save 2+ hours per tech per day. Learn more →

Tags:

route optimizationschedulingefficiencyfuel savings

Ready to Transform Your Field Service Business?

Join 10,000+ businesses using ServiceSync to streamline operations and grow revenue.

No credit card required • 14-day free trial • Full feature access